<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Happy Family Co-op</title>
	<atom:link href="http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Important Links by Mugsy</title>
		<link>http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/imporant-links/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Mugsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/?p=24#comment-31</guid>
		<description>the link for UNFI should be updated to 
https://www.unfi.com/default.aspx

the current link is to an aggregator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the link for UNFI should be updated to<br />
<a href="https://www.unfi.com/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://www.unfi.com/default.aspx</a></p>
<p>the current link is to an aggregator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jobs by noodleito</title>
		<link>http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/jobs-lists-descriptions/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>noodleito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/?page_id=16#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Hi there... just getting this...
I think it should stay at 3, however, because we are not functioning at full capacity. Ideally, and with all of our household openings filled, we could have 3 people loading.

I&#039;d like to change it back, but add a *note saying, we are currently not at full staff, or something to that affect.

Thanks for the careful eye, Mugsy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there&#8230; just getting this&#8230;<br />
I think it should stay at 3, however, because we are not functioning at full capacity. Ideally, and with all of our household openings filled, we could have 3 people loading.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to change it back, but add a *note saying, we are currently not at full staff, or something to that affect.</p>
<p>Thanks for the careful eye, Mugsy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jobs by noodleito</title>
		<link>http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/jobs-lists-descriptions/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>noodleito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/?page_id=16#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I changed it to two . . . 
Ruth Anne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed it to two . . .<br />
Ruth Anne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jobs by Mugsy</title>
		<link>http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/jobs-lists-descriptions/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Mugsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://happyfamilycoop.wordpress.com/?page_id=16#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Under Delivery Crew Jobs: Loaders: it says Three people to carry... 

Our teams are only 3 people, so there can only be two Loaders, if the third person is the Invoice Checker. I agree that it worked better with 3 loaders, but we&#039;d need to increase membership to return to that arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Delivery Crew Jobs: Loaders: it says Three people to carry&#8230; </p>
<p>Our teams are only 3 people, so there can only be two Loaders, if the third person is the Invoice Checker. I agree that it worked better with 3 loaders, but we&#8217;d need to increase membership to return to that arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
